From a focused buying team to a full public-sector procurement office. Tell us your procurement volume and team, and we will recommend the right tier.
Plans ( 4 )
For small buying teams running a handful of structured purchases a year.
Choose Starter if you buy a few times a year.
Recommended start
For procurement teams with a steady flow of purchases.
Choose Growth if purchases land every month.
For large enterprises that need depth, traceability and priority support.
Choose Enterprise if procurement is a department.
For government and public institutions with the highest volume and audit needs.
Choose Public Sector if every file must survive public audit.
* ≈45k AI credits take one purchase from spec to a documented vendor decision. Built for purchases worth six figures and up.
Volumes, categories and audit requirements differ too much for one honest number. Tell us how much you buy and with how many people; we come back with a figure and founding terms, usually the same day. Sitting between tiers? The figure follows your numbers.
WHAT MOVES THE FIGURE purchases per year · seats · categories · audit requirements
Send your numbers →Compare ( 9 sections )
“When our CFO challenged the pick, the whole decision was one record. No week of digging through email, every requirement signed off, compliant and audit-ready.”
İsmail KayakıranQuestions ( 4 )
By your volume: purchases per year, seats, categories and audit requirements. You get it in writing, with founding terms. Send your numbers →
Nothing. The test run is free, scoped to one finished purchase, delivered in 5 days. You only pay once you pick a plan. Start a test run →
Your documents live in an isolated workspace with role-based access. Suppliers' quotes stay confidential and stay yours. Security documentation comes before any pilot.
The first run fits inside a week; your team keeps its process while the analyst does the reading.
On the roadmap ( founding pilots decide what we build first )
Before the price talk
Bring one finished purchase. We run it beside your team's result, you judge the difference, and the pricing conversation happens with the evidence on the table.